Holy chirst, learn to use the posting markup. This post looks like what I see after I wipe my ***.
Anyway.
Ahhh useless drivel.
I know, I'll respond anyway. It's a slow day for me.
The point is you threw out statements that were false and misleading in the initial post. If you want to qualify that by using “estimates” then yeah maybe your right, in a retarded sort of way. I can and will prove my statements. Where is your proof? Oh yeah...
Proof of what? That you loose weight from decreasing calorie intake and that calorie intake comes from food?
One would have thought even you could have folowed the arrows there, but I guess not.
Your making it up as you go. Hey, keep talking, maybe someday you'll say something semi-intelligent.
What did you do take five minutes out of your posting time to do a web search for that site? I gave you two studies that prove that extreme low calorie diets are dangerous and need to be monitored by a Physician.
No, you linked a few studies about eating disorders. Which is like linking a few studies about nuclear weapons in a debate about gun controll.
Then you talk about a low calorie diet. Didn’t you say “lose a hundred pounds in a year”and your statement made the assumption you were talking about a 200 pound person. Okay so if we are estimating where is the limit on the estimate? I’m only going by what you wrote. Are you changing it?
How did I make the assumption that I was talking about a 200 pound person? Amazing the things you randomly assume and infer magically.
Why bother to have me post at all. I'll just post a bucnh with no text and you can just make up something you want to argue about and say it was assumed.
Then you corrected yourself by saying most people need to lose about 40 pounds. So what is the deal? If I estimate that a 200-pound person can lose approximately 100 pounds in a year that still equates to extreme dieting by any standard. It's feasible to say that a 200 pound person has the ability to lose 40 pounds if they are overweight (through modified dieting and exercise).
Again, pulling the 200 pound person out of your ***, I assume.
Well gee I guess the dyslexia didn't interfere with your spelling of “perspicacious”. Found a dictionary huh?
Being dyslexic doesn't mean I mispell every word. It means that I mispell words often and don't realize it. I'm not particularly bothered by it, particulalry since I can use a spell checking program if I feel like it. Sadly, there's no salient argument chacking program so you're pretty much out of luck.
You are right about something. Dyslexia has nothing to do with intelligence. However actually using a word processor does. You should try it sometime. There is a helpful little tool called spell check. Oh wait. You didn’t understand that?
Maybe this will help.
Three is a heplflu litltle tolo callde spell chekc.
And for the record I didn't end the sentence below improperly. You failed to read the quote with it. Go back and read it again.
No kidding?
You mean it was meant to continue on to the quoted word below? who knew! I ASSUMED THAT IT DIDN'T.
Hey, that's easy! Now I can argue as you would!
No… You can’t.
Of course I can. I have. Many, many times. Eighty pounds of gear really isn't that much. Pretty much anyone who's been through Basic Training has probably run with that much or close to it.
I don't know why you find it so ludicrous. I've run while carrying someone who weighed over 100 pounds. It's not a superhuman thing. People do it all the time.
Everyone knows that’s what you have been doing the whole time.
Yeah, because...I've posted easily checkable facts?
You never studied… And yes you can do it improperly. Hello! McFly!!! Again, I present the two articles I gave to you. Read them first then make your criticisms.
Independent peer reviewed medical journals? Really? Name which ones? Or do you have to go find some? I’ll wait...
I'm not sure what you're looking for here. Do you want me to name a medical journal? To link a study? I'm a little lost here.
Really? How do you know? Where are your facts? Oh yeah... your making them up. Well I guess that's absolute. So there ya go you win.
Pardon me? Are you arguing the fact that if you consume more calories than you burn that you'll gain weight??
Great balls of fire, we've gone from ignorant to clinnically insane here. Had I realized I was arguing with someone who didn't understand the most basic of facts I'd have had a lot more fun with you.
Oh... okay. Hmmm... Wow let me think of a witty comeback on this one. Here ya go. I notice that you never let an idea interrupt the flow of your conversation.
Did it take you all four hours to come up with that, or just three or so? I think you're confused, though. I'd happily talk about a valid idea. I'm waiting to see one from you, but that's reall more a reflection on you than on me.
Hey I'm impressed. You actually thought of three answers. What happened they upgrade you to a 50 watt bulb in that brain of yours? /clap
Yes, I see you chose number 3, by the way.
Hot damn, I may be psychic after all!
In truth, I'm glad that you took the time out from your important duties as token retarded grocery bagger to strap on the drool cup and helmet and reply. I'd have been very saddened if the people on the little yellow school bus had somehow convinced you it was a bad idea.
Quote:
1)Be an adult and say "ok, ok, I was completely wrong, I aplogize"
-Can’t be this one because your wrong.
Yeah, about what?
If you're going to make that kind of assertation, I'd recomend that, in the future, you pick something that I'm wrong about and actually argue it.
Oh wait, I'm wrong about the fact that if you consume more calories that you expend you gain weight, right?
Quote:
2)Be a coward and not post again.
-HAHAHAHAHA.
Yeah, I didn't think that was very likely, either. It's pretty clear you're a "I meant to do that!" kind of person. Cut your left nut off, "I meant to do that!" Get beaten to a fine red mist on a message board argument "I meant to do that!! I'm winning!!"
Pretty much what I figured.
Okay that means one left. Hey maybe you are right about something.
Quote:
3)Be yourself and dig yourself deeper and deeper into a whole of hypocracy and illogic and attempt to continue arguing your points, whatever it is you think they may be.
Yeah, dead on with that one, baby.
Damn, I'm good.
-Hypocrisy??? Illogic??? Okay gee lets refute actual case studies and medical documentation and classify it as illogic. Not only that lets refuse to look at them and use other websites that have absolutely nothing to do with the conversation in order to prove me wrong. That way we will definitely get the point across! If there was a kewpie doll for dumb statements you’d win hands down.
You linked actual case studies of eating disorders.
They were about as relevant as if you'd linked **** eating goat ****, allthough in fairness to the goats, not as intresting.
Oops all out of choices.
All out of any sort of argument, too I guess. Trust me, you don't want this to deginerate into random personal attacks, you're outmanned there.
Scurry off and try to dig up something that supports your crazy wild eyed fantasy that you can eat more calories than you burn off but loose wieght somehow through the power of prayer or whatever whacky tin foil hat theory you're arguing and then I can continue to make you look foolish.
I look forward to your witty reparte.