Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Oink - In memoriamFollow

#1 Oct 31 2007 at 7:59 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,632 posts
Roughly eight days ago, the music torrent hosting site Oink was shut down by a few different corporations. Its servers were seized, its owner arrested (he's out on bail now, I believe), its tracker shut down. Oink was known for being probably the most reliable music torrent site on all of the internet. If you wanted it, you could find it there in at least five different qualities, ranging from Lossles FLAC to 192 kbps MP3 to everything in-between. And if by some absurd chance it wasn't there, you could simply ask for it and it would no doubt appear before long. Strict download / upload ratios were enforced, thus making it so that if you did download something it would go at an incredible speed. I was a member, and it was glorious.

All gone.

This article
is one of the best things I have ever read regarding the current music piracy debate. It's a very long read, but it's well worth it. I recommend following the links that he posts throughout, as well. A couple select quotes are below.

The article wrote:
In this sense, Oink was not only an absolute paradise for music fans, but it was unquestionably the most complete and most efficient music distribution model the world has ever known. I say that safely without exaggeration. It was like the world's largest music store, whose vastly superior selection and distribution was entirely stocked, supplied, organized, and expanded upon by its own consumers. If the music industry had found a way to capitalize on the power, devotion, and innovation of its own fans the way Oink did, it would be thriving right now instead of withering. If intellectual property laws didn't make Oink illegal, the site's creator would be the new Steve Jobs right now. He would have revolutionized music distribution. Instead, he's a criminal, simply for finding the best way to fill rising consumer demand. I would have gladly paid a large monthly fee for a legal service as good as Oink - but none existed, because the music industry could never set aside their own greed and corporate bullshit to make it happen.

...

Which is why Oink was so great - take away all the rules and legal ties, all the ownership and profit margins, and naturally, the result is something purely for, by, and in service of the music fan. And it actually helps musicians - file-sharing is "the greatest marketing tool ever to come along for the music industry." One of Oink's best features was how it allowed users to connect similar artists, and to see what people who liked a certain band also liked. Similar to Amazon's recommendation system, it was possible to spend hours discovering new bands on Oink, and that's what many of its users did. Through sites like Oink, the amount and variety of music I listen to has skyrocketed, opening me up to hundreds of artists I never would have experienced otherwise. I'm now fans of their music, and I may not have bought their CDs, but I would have never bought their CD anyway, because I would have never heard of them! And now that I have heard of them, I go to their concerts, and I talk them up to my friends, and give my friends the music to listen to for themselves, so they can go to the concerts, and tell their friends, and so on. Oink was a network of music lovers sharing and discovering music. And yes, it was all technically illegal, and destined to get shut down, I suppose. But it's not so much that they shut Oink down that boils my blood, it's the fucking bullshit propaganda they put out there. If the industry tried to have some kind of compassion - if they said, "we understand that these are just music fans trying to listen to as much music as they can, but we have to protect our assets, and we're working on an industry-wide solution to accommodate the changing needs of music fans"... Well, it's too late for that, but it would be encouraging. Instead, they make it sound like they busted a Columbian drug cartel or something. They describe it as a highly-organized piracy ring. Like Oink users were distributing kiddie **** or some ****. The press release says: "This was not a case of friends sharing music for pleasure." Wh - what?? That's EXACTLY what it was! No one made any money on that site - there were no ads, no registration fees. The only currency was ratio - the amount you shared with other users - a brilliant way of turning "free" into a sort of booming mini-economy. The anti-piracy groups have tried to spin the notion that you had to pay a fee to join Oink, which is NOT true - donations were voluntary, and went to support the hosting and maintenance of the site. If the donations spilled into profit for the guy who ran the site, well he damn well deserved it - he created something truly remarkable.


OiNK - You will be missed.
#2 Oct 31 2007 at 8:10 PM Rating: Decent
I read that a few days ago...
#3 Oct 31 2007 at 8:17 PM Rating: Good
Saw this last week ('cause I'm subscribed to his feed), though I never got around to posting it here.

I agree pretty much whole-heartedly with what he has to say on the subject.
#4 Oct 31 2007 at 8:56 PM Rating: Excellent
I am a sad panda. Oink was the best torrent site on the internet, hands down.

There are two sites that have sprung up in response, what.cd and waffles.fm

I'm on what.cd and have invites, and would love an invite to waffles if someone has one (though it says they are getting DDOS'd).
#5 Oct 31 2007 at 9:15 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,738 posts
I never hear about anything good until it's shut down. Smiley: glare
____________________________
Mazra wrote:
I looked out the window and saw a big fireball in the sky. I'm not going outside until it's gone.
#6 Oct 31 2007 at 10:04 PM Rating: Good
When will people realize you cannot run a black market venture on the internet. It's just too public. We're going to have to take it offline and resort to distribution via some other media. Maybe we'll save all these MP3s on to some kind of portable media. We could use magnetic.. or better yet optical storage.. like laser discs, but smaller. We can trade them around and copy them via readily available devices already on the market called "burners", and then we can distribute those copies to others, at which point those copies can be "ripped" back to their original digital format and played back on any number of devices without this nasty "DRM" stuff. Oh wait..........
#7 Nov 01 2007 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,632 posts
StubsOnAsura the Shady wrote:
When will people realize you cannot run a black market venture on the internet. It's just too public. We're going to have to take it offline and resort to distribution via some other media. Maybe we'll save all these MP3s on to some kind of portable media. We could use magnetic.. or better yet optical storage.. like laser discs, but smaller. We can trade them around and copy them via readily available devices already on the market called "burners", and then we can distribute those copies to others, at which point those copies can be "ripped" back to their original digital format and played back on any number of devices without this nasty "DRM" stuff. Oh wait..........


Mmmm, gotta love regression.
#8REDACTED, Posted: Nov 01 2007 at 1:46 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I got wooshed
#9 Nov 01 2007 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
**
907 posts
Lady Tasera wrote:
I never hear about anything good until it's shut down. Smiley: glare


My sentiments exactly :(

Edited, Nov 1st 2007 4:46pm by Deadbeet
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 256 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (256)