Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Another cut-n-paste.Follow

#27 Mar 07 2006 at 4:10 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
Elinda wrote:
Course I didn't hear the whole interview just the bits spewed about here and who knows maybe the media attention and suspension from teaching is what he was ultimately after?


I don't think it was the teacher that wanted the attention. I'm pretty sure the student was just after the media attention. After all why would you submit the recording to a drive time conservative talk show instead of TV News or better yet the school district.

[edit] Fixed for clarity

Edited, Tue Mar 7 16:11:57 2006 by baelnic
#28 Mar 07 2006 at 4:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Umm...given the fact that no one knows the complete story, I have only one thing to say.

SUCK IT DEMS! PUBBIES ROXXOR UR SOXXORZ!1!
Yeah, yeah... you Pubbies cry about the liberal education machine but I don't see you filling the teacher shortage for $30k a year Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#29 Mar 07 2006 at 4:14 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
Umm...given the fact that no one knows the complete story, I have only one thing to say.

SUCK IT DEMS! PUBBIES ROXXOR UR SOXXORZ!1!
Yeah, yeah... you Pubbies cry about the liberal education machine but I don't see you filling the teacher shortage for $30k a year Smiley: laugh

For even less than that you could just play a recording of the state-approved textbook and sidestep these kinds of nasty incidents entirely!
#30 Mar 07 2006 at 4:18 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
Now you state why you don't think it's propaganda, you find a liberal who used it in the past to great effect and use him to counter, etc etc. Any number of ways to have an intelligent discussion that don't involve getting the person that opposes your point of view dismissed so you don't have to hear it anymore. That's just plain weak.


Quote:
A high school social studies teacher


I don't know which private school you went to, but at my high school, you were just happy when the students didn't set your desk on fire.

This isn't about what you and I would do, but a bunch of dumb teenagers.

#31 Mar 07 2006 at 4:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
A great deal of critical thought is brought on by times of stress and trial. It's not like you're hitting them or taking their lunch money. You're just making them stand behind their arguments. These are high-school age kids here, not preschoolers.
So have the classroom engage in discussion and mediate rather than command. Have them hold a debate and research their positions. Have them write a position paper. Ask them probing questions ("But why this and not this?" "Why do you think that is?", etc) to make them dig deeper into their explanations rather than berate and mock them.

Whether or not the methods you mention can make students think, I still don't believe it's near the best way to make them think.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Mar 07 2006 at 4:20 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Quote:
Yeah, yeah... you Pubbies cry about the liberal education machine but I don't see you filling the teacher shortage for $30k a year


My Smiley: twocents?

Don't give them double salary pensions with full state benefits for 50 years after they retire. Bump up the salary.
#33 Mar 07 2006 at 4:20 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:

That makes no sense. Why would you seek that kind of publicity when all it would do is make you notorious, endanger your livelihood, and make you into a posterboy for the same propaganda you are denouncing? What does seem probable is that if the discussion topic was brought up by students, the students that recorded him knew ahead of time what his slant would be.
Oooh, tricksy kid got him to speak his mind only to publicize the interview. I like that.Smiley: grin

Too bad the teacher wasn't on his toes and didn't hold his tongue when perhaps he should have.



____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#34 Mar 07 2006 at 4:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Excuses, excuses...

If you cared about the students...

Smiley: grin
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Mar 07 2006 at 4:25 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Angstylicious wrote:
Because oviously our children are too weak-minded to think for themselves.

You have entirely too much faith in our youth.

To quote the great Tommy Lee Jones:

A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it.
#36 Mar 07 2006 at 4:41 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Why did this thread make me think of Draccy?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#37 Mar 07 2006 at 5:16 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Here's something to ponder:

If the teacher had admiringly compared Bush to George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, would he be suspended for not offering a balanced negative viewpoint?


#38 Mar 07 2006 at 5:26 PM Rating: Good
***
2,824 posts
trickybeck wrote:
If the teacher had admiringly compared Bush to George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, would he be suspended for not offering a balanced negative viewpoint?


That's not a positive view of old Bushie. He's twice the President as GW and he's liberating us from Terrorism which is a greater feat than Lincoln. You just can't compare Bush to anyone else in history ... it'd be like a sin.
#39 Mar 07 2006 at 6:22 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Here is a video of an interview that Matt Lauer had with this Geography Teacher.

I'm ambivalent. I actually drove home from work pondering this and thought perhaps I was way off in my earlier comments. My own personal experience with a really great and somewhat stifled high school social studies teacher says "let them teach in however is most effective" but I guess I can't really make an informed decision one way or another about this without knowing this teachers background.

Though, I certainly don't see that the suspension and investigation that is to follow is out of line for the complaints that are registered.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#40 Mar 07 2006 at 7:04 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
NephthysWanderer the Charming wrote:
I don't know which private school you went to, but at my high school, you were just happy when the students didn't set your desk on fire.

This isn't about what you and I would do, but a bunch of dumb teenagers.
I wouldn't know. I was never a dumb teenager.
Young men are apt to think themselves wise enough, as drunken men are apt to think themselves sober enough.

Jophiel wrote:
Whether or not the methods you mention can make students think, I still don't believe it's near the best way to make them think.
I don't think anyone's arguing that. What I am saying is that it's good exercise for life.

Jacobsdeception the Sly wrote:
You have entirely too much faith in our youth.

I just don't like underestimating people.

trickybeck wrote:
Here's something to ponder:

If the teacher had admiringly compared Bush to George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, would he be suspended for not offering a balanced negative viewpoint?

Good point.
#41 Mar 08 2006 at 8:27 PM Rating: Good
**
811 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
A great deal of critical thought is brought on by times of stress and trial. It's not like you're hitting them or taking their lunch money. You're just making them stand behind their arguments. These are high-school age kids here, not preschoolers.
So have the classroom engage in discussion and mediate rather than command. Have them hold a debate and research their positions. Have them write a position paper. Ask them probing questions ("But why this and not this?" "Why do you think that is?", etc) to make them dig deeper into their explanations rather than berate and mock them.

Whether or not the methods you mention can make students think, I still don't believe it's near the best way to make them think.


I've talked to a few teachers about this sort of thing, and it seems that it's usually the case that the discussions that are just run by students primarily don't really end up going anywhere usually because most students will have a fairly narrow view of the world.

The discussions seem to usually degenerate into overly simplified conclusions that would probably be more depressing than anything. Given the role of mediation would lead to a more passive role in which you aren't really leading the discussion in any interesting way.

Though they could just be bad teachers.

But I would think challenging peoples' beliefs would help a lot more than trying to comfort peoples' beliefs continuously while only occasionally interjecting small bits of opinions.
#42 Mar 08 2006 at 11:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Vensuvio wrote:
Though they could just be bad teachers.
They could be but, since I've never met them, it'd be unfair of me to imply so.

Even while mediating or allowing students to discuss things, there's nothing to prevent an instructor from seizing upon a path or train of thought and directing the conversation in that direction.

I don't really see where a student's "narrow world view" (and I'll admit that's often the case) is any less condusive to meaningful debate than berating a student, calling them stupid and mocking their faith until they cry. At least the former can be blamed upon a lack of worldly experience on the part of the students. The latter is just an egocentric power-trip at the expense of your position in the classroom.

There's probably a middleground in there between "reading a magazine while the students bullsh[Aqua][/Aqua]it their opinions on Iraq" and "Going on lengthy, polarized tirades and verbally abusing students who disagree with you". Mind you, I'm not accusing Mr. Bennish of the latter but rather directing my thoughts about Flea's previous instructor.

As for Mr. Bennish, I don't have the information to make an intelligent opinion on what should become of him and what should have happened. It's almost hard to muster enthusiasm. No matter the outcome, the Right will make him into a demon and the Left will make him into a martyr. I doubt either will significantly affect the status quo.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#43 Mar 09 2006 at 8:33 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Actually, this issue has been on the back burner of political debate for some time. While I'm not an avid listener to political talk radio (I actually started by listening to Air America to get that viewpoint then started swapping between that and other stations to get a bigger picture), I have certainly seen a trend in call-ins and complaints on the conservative shows about overly Liberal teachers in many schools.

There's certainly no way to know how balanced this is, since it's not like Liberal callers are going to call into those shows to complain about conservative viewpoints being pushed down liberal student's throats. However, when the topic is broached, there are a *lot* of students who call in and talk about experiences they've had and the degree to which our education system and the teachers within it tend to bias teaching to a liberal viewpoint.


Haven't been a student for over a decade (aside from the occasional university class taken for my own enjoyment), so I can't say personally. But this wasn't something the student did on his own. This is a reaction to these reports. The general consensus going on the various conservative shows is to advise students that when they feel a professor/teacher has crossed the line in terms of bias, to record the lecture and get it out on the radio so more people can become aware of the problem.


Looks like this is just the first student to do so. Whether this will turn out to be a bunch of whiney kids cherry picking taped bits of conversations to make it appear biased, or whether this is legitimate student action to fight against what they see as unfair practices in our education system remains to be seen.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#44 Mar 11 2006 at 12:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Another win for the evil Liberal Education Establishment!

DENVER, COLORADO -- A high school teacher placed on leave after comparing President Bush's State of the Union address to speeches by Adolf Hitler has been reinstated, his attorney and school officials said Friday.

Officials declined to say whether Jay Bennish faced disciplinary action. His attorney, David Lane, said Bennish would be back in the classroom Monday "with full pay."

Bennish had been on paid leave from Overland High School in Aurora since March 1 while the Cherry Creek School District determined whether he violated a district rule that teachers present balancing viewpoints in the classroom.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 Mar 12 2006 at 8:32 PM Rating: Decent
As I understand it, the student tried to get the school board to go over the contents of the tape for more than a week, they refused until it was released to the local talk show. I had no objection to his remarks in comparison of Hitler/Bush, I did however bristle a bit at his comments about commerce and business.

Seems the kid and his Father had an appearance scheduled on the Today Show with Matt "The Skinhead" Lauer and had their invitation pulled. One can surmise the reasons, I choose to believe it is the natural tendency of NBC to present only one side of a story rather than to present the facts and let the viewer decide.
#46 Mar 12 2006 at 8:48 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Since when is Bush bashing been an alternative perspective?
#47 Mar 12 2006 at 8:54 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Since 2000.


Well, since 1988 if you want to get technical.


#48 Mar 13 2006 at 12:06 AM Rating: Decent
Bennish wrote:

challenge students to think critically


There lies the the problem. It doesn't comply with the "No ****** left behind" program.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 497 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (497)