Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Pope No Mo'Follow

#27 Feb 11 2013 at 10:13 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Ahhh, ok. So all they have to do is not vote for n Italian guy and name him Peter The Roman to avoid the end of the world thing?
#28 Feb 11 2013 at 10:15 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Samira wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
As a lapsed Catholic whom was a big fan of Pope John Paul III, & disliked Benedict, I'm good with this.



Who. There's almost never a time when "whom was" is going to work.

Mein Gott, he's a serial offender!

Yes, I really am that bored.
#29 Feb 11 2013 at 10:16 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
"In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Peter the Roman, who will feed his flock amid many tribulations, after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people. The End."


Well, "amid many tribulations" is dead on. Whoever takes over is gonna have to deal with the mess of the pedo priest scandal, reconciling the archaic views of birth and contraception with the modern day realities of an overpopulated world and disease, and the mass exodus of church members to Protestant sects that are more liberal, to agnosticism, atheism, and general who-cares-about-it-ism from the cradle Catholics.

#30 Feb 11 2013 at 10:16 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
catwho wrote:
So don't pick anyone named Peter, or who is from Rome or Italy. Problem solved.

Silly cat, that's not how these prophecies work! You'd think that when Jesus wasn't named Emmanuel folks might have scratched their heads and gone "Huh, guess he doesn't fulfill that prophecy." Oh wait, nope. They just give it to him as a title instead of a name and, voila! Insta-prophecy!

Same thing happened with Benedict; his line was something about an olive branch, and then his papal symbol had an olive branch in it. It's like the people who hold the prophecy and make the symbols are playing in the same rigged game or something! Smiley: lol
#31 Feb 11 2013 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:

IIRC, it's not the pope resigning that's the issue, it's that Benedict was the second-to-last pope named in the prophecy. The next one is "Peter the Roman," who will see the end of the Catholic Church. Something like that. The crazies were hoping that Benedict would last for a good long time, because they don't want to see the end of the Church.


He was never going to last a long time. Old dude is old, and he didn't even look young for his age or anything.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#32 Feb 11 2013 at 10:19 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
He was never going to last a long time. Old dude is old, and he didn't even look young for his age or anything.
I dunno, John lasted into his late millions.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#33 Feb 11 2013 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
He also looked less creepy.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#34 Feb 11 2013 at 10:22 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
He was never going to last a long time. Old dude is old, and he didn't even look young for his age or anything.
I dunno, John lasted into his late millions.
That was only because of the unholy magicks keeping him sort of more or less alive-ish.
#35 Feb 11 2013 at 10:24 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Spoonless wrote:
Samira wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
As a lapsed Catholic whom was a big fan of Pope John Paul III, & disliked Benedict, I'm good with this.



Who. There's almost never a time when "whom was" is going to work.

Mein Gott, he's a serial offender!

Yes, I really am that bored.

Bored or not - that's like stalker behavior. Smiley: um

Understandable and acceptable only if it's done in a pitiable attempt to impress Samira
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#36 Feb 11 2013 at 10:27 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
I only looked because I remembered the other misuses in recent threads, most notably the Ron Paul one. It just stood out because I don't typically see many people use "whom" at all. It would seem that most people will use "who" when "whom" should be used, but the opposite would appear to be more rare in occurrence.
#37 Feb 11 2013 at 10:36 AM Rating: Good
Whom gives a fuck what Elinda thinks anyway.

I'm on a roll.
#38 Feb 11 2013 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Kavekk wrote:
Whom gives a fuck what Elinda thinks anyway.

At least some one does.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#39 Feb 11 2013 at 1:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If I've learned anything today, it's that the doctrine of Papal Infallibility probably comes in second to only the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception when it comes to Catholic things completely misunderstood by the world at large.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#40 Feb 11 2013 at 1:44 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
I learned that the real reason we stopped using the electric chair for executions was because the people that survived apparently gained electricity based super powers.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#41 Feb 11 2013 at 1:47 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
If I've learned anything today, it's that the doctrine of Papal Infallibility probably comes in second to only the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception when it comes to Catholic things completely misunderstood by the world at large.


Write about it in your diary.
#42 Feb 11 2013 at 1:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kavekk wrote:
Write about it in your diary.

I thought I just did.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#43 Feb 11 2013 at 1:56 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Write about it in your diary.

I thought I just did.


Touché.
#44 Feb 11 2013 at 2:02 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Jophiel wrote:
If I've learned anything today, it's that the doctrine of Papal Infallibility probably comes in second to only the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception when it comes to Catholic things completely misunderstood by the world at large.

I think I understand the misunderstanding around Papal Infallibility (basically there are a ton of conditions that need to be met, and the last Infallible Edict was like in 1950 or something?), but what's misunderstood by Immaculate Conception? This is coming from a former Catholic, I always knew it as "Mary was untouched by even Original Sin, and remained sinless up through giving birth to Jesus, so only she was a proper vessel for Christ to come into world."

Is that right? I always understood it as a ham-fisted way of saying, even if some other virgin gave birth to a child (like Julius Caesar, who was said to be a virgin birth as well), only Mary alone was ever free of sin and thus able to birth the Messiah.
#45 Feb 11 2013 at 2:14 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
If I've learned anything today, it's that the doctrine of Papal Infallibility probably comes in second to only the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception when it comes to Catholic things completely misunderstood by the world at large.

Likewise, when to use whom vs who (Catholicly speaking).
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#46 Feb 11 2013 at 2:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The common misconception about the Immaculate Conception is that it refers to the virgin pregnancy of Mary and not to her own sinless state at the time she conceived. Or, more properly, Mary's own conception/birth without the taint of original sin.

"So you're pregnant even though you told me you broke up with Johnny? What was this, the Immaculate Conception?!"

Edited, Feb 11th 2013 2:17pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#47 Feb 11 2013 at 5:03 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Hey Smash. Is there a "Rollover" on the papal dead pool?

It's always been a safe bet to stick with a pontif, although if they go for the young-ish Aff'kuhn dude, might be worth switching back to Anthony Hopkins, despite his pickled liver keeping him semi-embalmed.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#48 Feb 11 2013 at 6:26 PM Rating: Good
Screenshot
.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#49 Feb 11 2013 at 6:37 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
No one has asked the important question. Does he get to keep the hat?
Screenshot
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#50 Feb 11 2013 at 7:39 PM Rating: Default
What's up with God picking this guy to be the pope? Shouldn't he have picked someone who could make it the whole way? It almost makes you believe that it's just human beings picking the Popes, and not God.
#51 Feb 11 2013 at 8:18 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Did we really need a half-assed sock?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 367 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (367)