Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Reply To Thread

We support equality except at work!Follow

#1 Nov 04 2013 at 10:18 PM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
GOP Senators failed to block Gay rights non discrimination at work.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/gay-rights-bill-clears-senate-republican-hurdle-house-010301611.html

Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A White House-backed bill to ban workplace discrimination against gays narrowly cleared a Republican procedural roadblock in the U.S. Senate on Monday with the support of a handful of Republicans, just hours after the party's top lawmaker declared his opposition.
On a vote of 61-30, one more than the needed 60, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to begin consideration of the bipartisan bill, with passage likely by the end of this week. Seven of the 45 Senate Republicans joined 52 Democrats and two independents in voting to move toward passage. All the no votes were cast by Republicans.
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2013 has become the latest example of the ideological struggle in a divided Republican Party.


____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#2 Nov 05 2013 at 12:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Heritage Action, a conservative advocacy group opposed to the bill, warned lawmakers last week that it would include their votes on it in their annual "legislative scorecard." It says the measure would undermine civil liberties, increase government interference in the labor market, and trample on religious liberty.
Although the bill exempts religious groups,


I'm sorry, I fail to see the connection. Also, **** these guys. **** 'em right in the ***. The Heritage folks are a bunch of ******.
#3 Nov 05 2013 at 1:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Dead in the House. Tea Party hates gays. Business groups want to be able to discriminate against gays without being sued.

Because, you know, liberty.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Nov 05 2013 at 3:11 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Someone quote that "rights for all except [...] nobody gets rights. America!" gag. I am currently unable to do so.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#5 Nov 05 2013 at 7:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Boehner probably won't even let it come to vote.
Quote:
The Speaker believes this legislation will increase frivolous litigation and cost American jobs, especially small business jobs," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said in a statement.
Do you suppose he ever thinks about what he says?

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#6 Nov 05 2013 at 7:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It'll also increase non-frivolous litigation to protect homosexuals and cost small business jobs among firms that discriminate against gays, etc.

But we can't have that. Liberty! Freedom! Equal Rights to hate gays!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#7 Nov 05 2013 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Moderate Republicans trying to appear moderate and keep the tea party yuckiness away from them on a safe bill that won't get past the nutballs in the other chamber?
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#8 Nov 05 2013 at 10:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kirk (R-IL) was also one of the GOP voices who led to DADT being repealed a few years ago. I think he's probably sincere in his support for ENDA although burnishing his moderate credentials in Illinois is a nice side effect.

Edited, Nov 5th 2013 10:39am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#9 Nov 05 2013 at 1:49 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Why do you guys vote so much? It seems like your politicians are always campaigning.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#10 Nov 05 2013 at 1:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"You guys", who? Citizens?

House Reps elected every 2 years
Senators every 6 years
President/Governors every 4 years

So you're going to have federal elections at least every other year. New Jersey & Virginia, for reasons I have no interest in knowing, have their gubernatorial elections of "off years" so they're being talked about since nothing else is happening. But they still only elect a governor every four years.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Nov 05 2013 at 1:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Why do you guys vote so much? It seems like your politicians are always campaigning.
We don't, they are.

It's against freedom of speech to limit political fundraising or something. Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#12 Nov 05 2013 at 2:12 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,564 posts
Jophiel wrote:
"You guys", who? Citizens?

House Reps elected every 2 years
Senators every 6 years
President/Governors every 4 years

So you're going to have federal elections at least every other year. New Jersey & Virginia, for reasons I have no interest in knowing, have their gubernatorial elections of "off years" so they're being talked about since nothing else is happening. But they still only elect a governor every four years.



Ya citizens, you always voting on people. You never stop. Vote vote vote. You guys love to vote. Not just for Washington. Its really weird. We hate voting in Canada, we accept one way or the other we are getting the shaft so really its just do you want it to the right or the left. We give people majorities so we don't have to vote for a while.





Edited, Nov 5th 2013 3:12pm by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#13 Nov 05 2013 at 2:23 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Yea, and we do things like appoint Senators for life...
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#14 Nov 05 2013 at 2:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
rdmcandie wrote:
You guys love to vote. Not just for Washington.

Well, most state and local elections fall on the same day as the federal ones if they can manage it just as a matter of economics. Holding elections is expensive.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Nov 05 2013 at 3:48 PM Rating: Good
My city has nothing to vote on this year. Not even a referendum for dog catcher or anything.

Our polls aren't even open. Smiley: frown

Edited, Nov 5th 2013 4:48pm by Catwho
#16 Nov 05 2013 at 4:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
We just had a school levy, which will almost certainly pass by some obscene amount. I put down the Skyrim long enough to fill in the little square and then took the ballot out to the mailbox when I went to work the next morning.


Edited, Nov 5th 2013 2:07pm by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#17 Nov 05 2013 at 4:47 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Yea, and we do things like appoint Senators for life...
You should make that a king of the hill kind of thing. Off the previous Senator in hand to hand gladiatorial combat and you get to be the new Senator.
#18 Nov 05 2013 at 5:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
In happier gay rights news...
Political Wire wrote:
The Illinois General Assembly "narrowly approved a gay marriage bill, clearing the way for Illinois to become the 15th state to legalize same-sex unions," the Chicago Tribune reports.

"The bill got 61 votes in the House, one more than the bare minimum needed to send the measure back to the Senate, which quickly signed off. Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn has said he would sign the bill into law should it reach his desk."
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#19gbaji, Posted: Nov 05 2013 at 6:15 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I'll go out on a limb and guess that they believe religious liberty should not be limited just to religious groups. Put another way, someone should not be required to be a member of or operating on behalf of an official religious organization (based on tax status) in order to have religious freedom.
#20 Nov 05 2013 at 6:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Right. Everyone should be allowed to ignore laws based on just saying it's for religion. Sorry, black lady... my faith in No Black Ladyology says you can't be a clerk in my store. Now why don't you move on along so some nice white men can get the job as my God intended?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#21 Nov 05 2013 at 6:53 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
Yep. If a moslem refused to hire Jews, I'm possitive gbaji and his GOP buddies would totally support him!
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#22gbaji, Posted: Nov 05 2013 at 7:28 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) It's a matter of social degrees and acceptance. I could go in the other direction and mock someone whose faith says that a @#%^phile can't be a clerk in their store. There's no objective absolute right and wrong here.
#23 Nov 05 2013 at 10:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Right. Except a pedophile is a felon and a danger to small children, while a black lady and a homosexual are not.

#24 Nov 05 2013 at 11:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
It's a matter of social degrees and acceptance. I could go in the other direction and mock someone whose faith says that a @#%^phile can't be a clerk in their store. There's no objective absolute right and wrong here.

Straight to the gay-pedo dog-whistle? Seems a little abrupt, even for you. Been reading the stormfront forums again?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#25 Nov 05 2013 at 11:14 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Right. Except a @#%^phile is a felon and a danger to small children, while a black lady and a homosexual are not.

Hey, easy now. There are no absolutes. I'm sure there have been teams of black ladies and homosexuals who were felons and dangers to small children. I'm going to assume they named themselves "Butch Assity and Slumdance Sista"

Butch is the gay one. The black one probably has a big hat.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#26 Nov 05 2013 at 11:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Right. Everyone should be allowed to ignore laws based on just saying it's for religion.
No. But an advocacy group is certainly within its right to oppose a law on the basis of their religion. Which is what they are doing. Currently, the law does not grant special protective status based on sexual orientation.

Nor should it since an advocacy group is not a church.

Quote:
It's a matter of social degrees and acceptance. I could go in the other direction and mock someone whose faith says that a @#%^phile can't be a clerk in their store. There's no objective absolute right and wrong here.

Which is why "Bona fide religious organizations are exempt within their actual religious duties" is the best possible compromise and "Anyone who doesn't like a law on the basis of their faith shouldn't have to follow it because... religious liberty!" is a shitty, short-minded excuse.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 281 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (281)