Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Crazy feminists, what will they think of next?Follow

#1 Dec 26 2013 at 5:37 PM Rating: Sub-Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Since it is open season for Cryst, feminists make every effort to **** off people. I did not see similar attempt at the temple of the Religion Of Peace. Cowards. Wait, is there a female version of cowards?

I assume it will be interesting to see which side the politically correct will side with when that happens.

Disclaimer: I am not a believer.

PS. Here is feminist attack on the church in Argentina. Notice how the people that defend the church are just praying ( presumably for the crazy ******* to disperse ).

PS1. I kid.. but not that much.


Edited, Dec 26th 2013 6:50pm by angrymnk

Edited, Dec 26th 2013 6:52pm by angrymnk
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#2 Dec 26 2013 at 9:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"Cryst"?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Dec 26 2013 at 9:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
A crusty cyst.
#4 Dec 27 2013 at 12:42 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
"Cryst"?
Sounds like something Pizza Hut would come up with.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#5 Dec 27 2013 at 8:51 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Jophiel wrote:
"Cryst"?
I wonder if my computer can finally run that game.
#6 Dec 27 2013 at 10:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
cryst = crystalline; crystallized

My crystal has been giving me weird vibes too, I feel a new age thing coming on.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#7 Dec 30 2013 at 7:52 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
angrymnk wrote:
Cowards. Wait, is there a female version of cowards?

The question begs to be asked - why would you, and not all the rest of the peeps of the world, assume a coward by definition to be implicitly male?

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#8 Dec 30 2013 at 7:55 AM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
Elinda wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
Cowards. Wait, is there a female version of cowards?

The question begs to be asked - why would you, and not all the rest of the peeps of the world, assume a coward by definition to be implicitly male?



Because it's mainly used by males against other males?

Not defending just justifying.

Edited, Dec 30th 2013 8:56am by Shaowstrike
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#9 Dec 30 2013 at 2:03 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,010 posts
Elinda wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
Cowards. Wait, is there a female version of cowards?

The question begs to be asked - why would you, and not all the rest of the peeps of the world, assume a coward by definition to be implicitly male?



The same reason as when homophobia comments surface they are usually related to male on male activities.

Guys like angrymnk just don't realize that women are actually human beings and dismiss us completely as irrelevant.

Edited, Dec 30th 2013 3:03pm by Torrence
#10 Dec 30 2013 at 8:07 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Torrence wrote:
Elinda wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
Cowards. Wait, is there a female version of cowards?

The question begs to be asked - why would you, and not all the rest of the peeps of the world, assume a coward by definition to be implicitly male?



The same reason as when homophobia comments surface they are usually related to male on male activities.

Guys like angrymnk just don't realize that women are actually human beings and dismiss us completely as irrelevant.

You're a women?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#11 Dec 30 2013 at 10:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Debalic wrote:
Torrence wrote:
Elinda wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
Cowards. Wait, is there a female version of cowards?

The question begs to be asked - why would you, and not all the rest of the peeps of the world, assume a coward by definition to be implicitly male?



The same reason as when homophobia comments surface they are usually related to male on male activities.

Guys like angrymnk just don't realize that women are actually human beings and dismiss us completely as irrelevant.

You're a women?
That's completely irrelevant.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#12 Dec 31 2013 at 7:03 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Torrence wrote:
Elinda wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
Cowards. Wait, is there a female version of cowards?

The question begs to be asked - why would you, and not all the rest of the peeps of the world, assume a coward by definition to be implicitly male?



The same reason as when homophobia comments surface they are usually related to male on male activities.

Guys like angrymnk just don't realize that women are actually human beings and dismiss us completely as irrelevant.

Edited, Dec 30th 2013 3:03pm by Torrence


tsk tsk

I wasn't a part of the group that decided to go all out on language an oppressive tool of omnipresent patriarchy.

Btw. If I found women irrelevant, I would not be talking about them ( or a subset of them for that matter).




____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#13 Dec 31 2013 at 7:25 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
angrymnk wrote:


I wasn't a part of the group that decided to go all out on language an oppressive tool of omnipresent patriarchy.

You were the guy that in the OP alluded to a coward as being male..ie oppressed women with your poor assumptions of word definitions.

Cowards can be male or female or asexual.


Quote:
Btw. If I found women irrelevant, I would not be talking about them ( or a subset of them for that matter).
I suspect it's the other way around.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#14 Dec 31 2013 at 6:31 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Elinda wrote:
angrymnk wrote:


I wasn't a part of the group that decided to go all out on language an oppressive tool of omnipresent patriarchy.

You were the guy that in the OP alluded to a coward as being male..ie oppressed women with your poor assumptions of word definitions.

Cowards can be male or female or asexual.


Quote:
Btw. If I found women irrelevant, I would not be talking about them ( or a subset of them for that matter).
I suspect it's the other way around.


I am drunk, and you are an idiot. Note how me calling you an idiot does not mean I am calling all women idiots; just you. And I did not allude, nor did I assume any definitions. I am very unassuming.

Mostly completely unlike you.

Ok, happy new year to all men ( we all know where women are )^^;
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#15 Dec 31 2013 at 6:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Based on that post, I'm going to assume you're always drunk when you post.
#16 Dec 31 2013 at 7:12 PM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Based on that post, I'm going to assume you're always drunk when you post.
Either that or brain damaged.
#17 Jan 01 2014 at 2:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Yup, totally.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#18 Jan 01 2014 at 9:45 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Based on that post, I'm going to assume you're always drunk when you post.
Either that or brain damaged.


Yeah, it is not like I showed a story or two in which feminists behave in less than appropriate way. It is not like you jumped to their defense, because, even though they are ******* crazy, they can do no wrong. It is the law! Yep, I am the brain damaged, drug addled, semi literate, barely functional waste of oxygen. Absotively.

For the rest of class, could you tell me what you think about the women in church referenced in both stories? No, you wanna call me a women hater instead? That is cool; now **** off, and have a happy new year!

____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#19 Jan 01 2014 at 10:02 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
angrymnk wrote:
Yeah, it is not like I showed a story or two in which feminists behave in less than appropriate way.
What's that, a group of people who label themselves a certain way acting inappropriately? You've clearly blown the cover on a unique behavior pattern and deserve to be commended for it.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#20 Jan 01 2014 at 10:06 AM Rating: Good
An icy reception from lolgaxe.

Get it? lolgaxe hurt himself on some ice, that's the joke. Someone else suffered.

Smiley: laugh

Happy new year.
#21 Jan 02 2014 at 6:39 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
angrymnk wrote:
Yeah, it is not like I showed a story or two in which feminists behave in less than appropriate way.
What's that, a group of people who label themselves a certain way acting inappropriately? You've clearly blown the cover on a unique behavior pattern and deserve to be commended for it.


I can settle for a parade or fanfares.
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#22 Jan 02 2014 at 10:51 AM Rating: Good
***
2,010 posts
angrymnk wrote:


For the rest of class, could you tell me what you think about the women in church referenced in both stories? No, you wanna call me a women hater instead? That is cool; now @#%^ off, and have a happy new year!



I call into question whether or not you understand the definition of "inappropriate" behavior. So a couple women shouted in a church. Big deal. It's NOTHING compared to the thousands of years' worth of oppression and violence women have suffered all over the globe. I think we've earned the right to shout a little.

Put on your big girl panties and deal with it, angrymnk.
#23 Jan 02 2014 at 10:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
He's just upset he's functionally obsolete. Give him some time, he'll learn to deal with it.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#24 Jan 02 2014 at 11:17 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Torrence wrote:
I call into question whether or not you understand the definition of "inappropriate" behavior. So a couple women shouted in a church. Big deal. It's NOTHING compared to the thousands of years' worth of oppression and violence women have suffered all over the globe.

They can both be inappropriate. The women in question wouldn't have done it if it wasn't inappropriate -- they were, after all, trying to make a scene and be noticed.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Jan 02 2014 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
What Joph said.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#26 Jan 02 2014 at 11:32 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
He's just upset he's functionally obsolete. Give him some time, he'll learn to deal with it.


Quote:
Men are the new ball and chain.

Wouldn't the 'new' ball and chain be some kind of irremovable electronic monitoring device?

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 353 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (353)