Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Fugget about it!Follow

#52 Jan 15 2014 at 7:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Not speaking for all women, but I wouldn't want to be married to a man who neglected little things like paying taxes.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#53 Jan 15 2014 at 8:45 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Hell, my wife does our taxes. I can't handle that kind of shit.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#54 Jan 15 2014 at 9:24 PM Rating: Excellent
TirithRR wrote:
Samira wrote:
Quote:
Leads one to conclude that the demographic is basically impotent men who are bad at paying taxes. Who are getting divorced.


Cause, meet effect.


Women hate men who are bad at paying taxes.


They tend to also be bad at paying alimony and child support, unfortunately.
#55Almalieque, Posted: Jan 16 2014 at 5:02 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I've heard a lot of horror stories (biased of course) in reference to paying child support and alimony. Those are two laws that definitely need to be changed. For starters, child support should be paid in reference to cost of living of a child, not a percentage of your paycheck or flat rate per child.
#56 Jan 16 2014 at 5:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
The commercials are fascinating. My favorite is the dog vitamins where the testimonials are always "Them fancy science vet types gave me all sorts of terrible advice and done near killed my dog. Then I tried these here simple vitamins made by common folk and my dog is better than ever!" It's custom made for the conservative anti-science mindset.

No idea if it's market specific but all of the conservative talk commercial breaks here are basically:

Limp ****? Owe taxes? Buy gold! Buy newsletter! Getting divorced? Going bald? On an endless loop. Leads one to conclude that the demographic is basically impotent men who are bad at paying taxes. Who are getting divorced.


Well, between Gbaji, Thief and Varus we've got each of those covered at least once.

I'd say they've got em pegged.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#57 Jan 16 2014 at 7:07 AM Rating: Good
Almalieque wrote:
catwho wrote:


They tend to also be bad at paying alimony and child support, unfortunately.


I've heard a lot of horror stories (biased of course) in reference to paying child support and alimony. Those are two laws that definitely need to be changed. For starters, child support should be paid in reference to cost of living of a child, not a percentage of your paycheck or flat rate per child.


I've heard horror stories from the other end, of deadbeat dads who did everything in their power to avoid paying for children they wanted to have at first - until the kid was born disabled, or they traded their first wife for a younger, newer model, etc.

Here are gbaji's unemployment insurance moochers. They surf from job to job, state to state, until the lawyers catch up with them and start garnishing their wages for back child support, then they get themselves fired for incompetence so they can collect UI for a few months while they move elsewhere and find a new job again. Smiley: rolleyes

Edited, Jan 16th 2014 8:08am by Catwho
#58 Jan 16 2014 at 8:28 AM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
catwho wrote:


They tend to also be bad at paying alimony and child support, unfortunately.


I've heard a lot of horror stories (biased of course) in reference to paying child support and alimony. Those are two laws that definitely need to be changed. For starters, child support should be paid in reference to cost of living of a child, not a percentage of your paycheck or flat rate per child.


I always thought that percentages or flat rates were to keep from taking away all of someone's paycheck so they can afford housing and food.... It's ******* expensive to raise a child.
#59 Jan 16 2014 at 10:06 AM Rating: Good
That was my understanding as well - but I think it adds up once you start including multiple children.
#61 Jan 16 2014 at 10:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Only the little people pay taxes. Smiley: disappointed
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#63 Jan 16 2014 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
jimbrown45 wrote:
someproteinguy wrote:
Only the little people pay taxes. Smiley: disappointed


Because they have so much to tax.
Something like that. Maybe the better phrase would be "only the single people pay taxes." Pop out a couple of those and kiss any kind of meaningful tax burden goodbye for the next 20 years.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#64 Jan 16 2014 at 10:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
jimbrown45 wrote:
I'm still waiting for Democrats to explain to me how Obama can just simply disregard law. He forced a law on us and now he's going around exempting his buddies from the effects of it.

Regulatory power.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#65 Jan 16 2014 at 10:59 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Democrats are notorious for cheating on their taxes when they're paying them at all.


Citation please.

Poor people generally don't owe money at tax time. They also tend to qualify for a free e-file. If you're making under $25K/year, you'll probably get some kind of refund. You also don't have the complex investments, mortgages, and dividends that require complex tax filing assistance. Generally, if you're broke enough to qualify for government assistance, you're broke enough to be using the 1040 EZ form through Turbo Tax Free edition. Try cheating on that thing. If anything, they're more likely to make a simple mistake, and the online SaaS tax software is pretty good about catching those mistakes.
#67 Jan 16 2014 at 11:20 AM Rating: Good
If you're on welfare, you are by definition making less than $1000/month, and you probably aren't being taxed much on that.

They still have to file taxes, though, unless that amount is under $10,000/year.

And if they don't have to file taxes, then they can't cheat on them. Smiley: rolleyes
#69 Jan 16 2014 at 11:29 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
jimbrown45 wrote:
Samira wrote:
Not speaking for all women, but I wouldn't want to be married to a man who neglected little things like paying taxes.


So you married a conservative republican? Democrats are notorious for cheating on their taxes when they're paying them at all.
Cite.

The only tax evader I know is gbaji.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#70 Jan 16 2014 at 11:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Elinda wrote:
jimbrown45 wrote:
Samira wrote:
Not speaking for all women, but I wouldn't want to be married to a man who neglected little things like paying taxes.


So you married a conservative republican? Democrats are notorious for cheating on their taxes when they're paying them at all.
Cite.

The only tax evader I know is gbaji.
It's the single male. Smiley: tinfoilhat

Out of idle curiosity I looked things up, and ran across some citations for elected Democrats having more tax scandals in recent years than elected Republicans. That's as close I could get. Maybe that's where it comes from?
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#71 Jan 16 2014 at 11:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
When Obama was filling his cabinet there were a couple people with some tax issues. On the other hand, whoever is in the Oval Office is likely filling slots from his party so you have a lot more Democrats under scrutiny than Republicans in that case.

I dunno... I always just paid my taxes.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#72 Jan 16 2014 at 12:27 PM Rating: Excellent
jimbrown45 wrote:
Catwho wrote:
If you're on welfare, you are by definition making less than $1000/month, and you probably aren't being taxed much on that.

They still have to file taxes, though, unless that amount is under $10,000/year.

And if they don't have to file taxes, then they can't cheat on them. Smiley: rolleyes


I consider anyone receiving free federal housing and food stamps, and most people claiming disability, as being on welfare.


SSI is a different program than welfare.

So you think someone like my mentally ill sister, who has the functionality of a ten year old and who hears voices constantly, should be out there working?

She tried that once. Worked in a sponge factory for $2/hour. Minimum wage laws didn't apply since they classified themselves as some sort of jobs training. She quit, not because she was at risk of losing her SSI (not at $2/hour...) but because they were abusive and intolerant of doing anything except inspecting sponges, and would lock up any disabled laborer who started behaving funny for the rest of the shift. I'm pretty sure that "jobs training" factory got shut down not long after she left.
#73 Jan 16 2014 at 12:39 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
So you think someone like my mentally ill sister, who has the functionality of a ten year old and who hears voices constantly, should be out there working?


Let's check the GOP platform....let's see....mentally ill, basically unemployable....here we go, yes, they have a plan. Shot behind the chemical shed, apparently.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#74 Jan 16 2014 at 12:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I've heard a lot of horror stories (biased of course) in reference to paying child support and alimony. Those are two laws that definitely need to be changed. For starters, child support should be paid in reference to cost of living of a child, not a percentage of your paycheck or flat rate per child.

Nope, they are calibrated pretty well, really. People just don't like their actions having consequences. Makes no sense for someone with an income of $20M/yr to pay $500/mo in child support. It disadvantages the child, The "support" part has never been intended to mean "life support so the kid doesn't starve to death" it's always meant "support the lifestyle the child would have had if there had been no separation".

Are there calculating women tricking men into having children and paying for their lavish lifestyles? Probably. Enough that someone should change a law over it? Not ever vaguely close. Legislation never has to meet the "PERFECT OR NOTHING!!!!" standard. I don't give a fuck about anyones "My cousin's ex wife is a *****" anecdotes, incidentally. I mean feel free, but expect ridicule and skepticism.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#75 Jan 16 2014 at 1:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
So you think someone like my mentally ill sister, who has the functionality of a ten year old and who hears voices constantly, should be out there working?


Let's check the GOP platform....let's see....mentally ill, basically unemployable....here we go, yes, they have a plan. Shot behind the chemical shed, apparently.
All this needless twisting of the GOP position. You take the worst case scenario and pretend it's their answer to everything, use it to bash them and make them appear worse than they are.

If someone would take a closer look they'd realize that's only done under a very specific set of circumstances when the first exorcism fails, the person is an immediate to risk the health and safety of others, and they can't get a more experienced priest to attempt the ritual again before sundown.

Typical liberal propaganda. Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#76 Jan 16 2014 at 1:19 PM Rating: Good
someproteinguy wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
So you think someone like my mentally ill sister, who has the functionality of a ten year old and who hears voices constantly, should be out there working?


Let's check the GOP platform....let's see....mentally ill, basically unemployable....here we go, yes, they have a plan. Shot behind the chemical shed, apparently.
All this needless twisting of the GOP position. You take the worst case scenario and pretend it's their answer to everything, use it to bash them and make them appear worse than they are.

If someone would take a closer look they'd realize that's only done under a very specific set of circumstances when the first exorcism fails, the person is an immediate to risk the health and safety of others, and they can't get a more experienced priest to attempt the ritual again before sundown.

Typical liberal propaganda. Smiley: oyvey


And when you say "immediate risk to the health and safety of others" you include "needs government assistance to house, food, and clothe, correct?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 325 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (325)