Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

This again, only different. Kind of. Follow

#202 Sep 02 2014 at 6:05 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
angrymnk wrote:
Quote:

That's the real problem in Ferguson. The police in Ferguson have displayed amazing restraint in the face of what looks like a determined effort to create a violent response so the cameras can show it and inflame yet more violence.



**** cryst.. what restraint? Are we looking at two different towns with the same name? The PD there did everything in their power to pour as much gas on the fire as possible.


I'm sorry? Did they run through the protesters with batons beating them? Did they indiscriminately fire water cannons at marching protesters? Did they let dogs loose on them? No? That's restraint. What they have done, if you actually bother to find longer and more complete video images rather than the still images and short clips most people watch, is let the protesters go anywhere they want, with normal officer in the area keeping an eye on things, but not intervening at all. Only when reports of looting or violence is reported (or protesters actually go up to the police and attack them), do they arrive in any sort of force. Even then, they form a line with vehicles. They shout into bullhorns for 10-20 minutes warning everyone to leave the area. They sound sirens and whistles. Only after they've given every single person with a lick of sense plenty of time to leave do they then very slowly and methodically begin firing smoke grenades (some tear gas as well, but it's unclear when that is used instead of just smoke) towards those still formed up. This causes the crowd to disperse, without causing any injuries. They then slowly walk forward and repeat the process until the area is cleared.


What you are seeing is people running to where this is going on, apparently deliberately so they can get caught up in the police response. Then they report how they were attacked by police for doing nothing at all. Um... Don't run to where the riot is dummy!

And yeah, that's massive restraint. What exactly do you think the cops should do when they get reports of looting and violence? Nothing? Just let people's property get destroyed? Just let people get beaten, robbed,and killed? The police still have to protect property and lives, even in the midst of protesting. Far more injuries have occurred as a result of violence taking place under cover of these "peaceful protests" than has occurred as a result of police response.

Quote:
And here is a way to compare it; a week ago Chicago cop killed a teen, but here are the things that are different:
- the kid had a gun
- police report was actually written
- there is an official investigation just in case
- we knew who the officer was


None of this has anything to do with the police response to the protests and riots though. We can also discuss mistakes made by the police with regards to investigation and whatnot, but I was talking about (and you responded to) whether the physical police actions were causing the violence in the town. I don't believe that they are. I'm quite certain that if the police all stayed in the station and did nothing while the protests were going on, we'd see half the town burn down. And when police didn't respond still, the mob would probably march on the police station and force them to react.

You don't get that this sort of "protest" is designed to maximize the odds of violent confrontation. The protesters will keep upping the ante until they get a violent response. At some point, you do have to place the blame on them. I'll repeat again: All that has to happen for the violence to stop is for the protesters to stop protesting. They stay home, and there's no violence. The cops stay home and there is. The cops show up and there is So who is to blame here?


Oh. And I'll second someone's point that had the police taken the body from the scene, the narrative would have been about how they were covering up the crime or something. It's lose lose.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#203 Sep 02 2014 at 7:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
What they have done, if you actually bother to find longer and more complete video images rather than the still images and short clips most people watch, is let the protesters go anywhere they want, with normal officer in the area keeping an eye on things, but not intervening at all. Only when reports of looting or violence is reported (or protesters actually go up to the police and attack them), do they arrive in any sort of force. Even then, they form a line with vehicles. They shout into bullhorns for 10-20 minutes warning everyone to leave the area. They sound sirens and whistles. Only after they've given every single person with a lick of sense plenty of time to leave do they then very slowly and methodically begin firing smoke grenades (some tear gas as well, but it's unclear when that is used instead of just smoke) towards those still formed up. This causes the crowd to disperse, without causing any injuries. They then slowly walk forward and repeat the process until the area is cleared.

Do you have links to all these 20+ minute long videos you've been watching?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#204 Sep 02 2014 at 7:51 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
You hit a dog in the road, you know it's dead, but you'll probably still pull over and check and see.

Is that what you people do? I either chuckle in a satisfied manner or yell "who's laughing now dog!"


I think that's what the cops did as well.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#205 Sep 02 2014 at 8:52 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Quote:
Just let people get beaten, robbed,and killed?


You are right. That is the police job to beat and kill; can't have'em takin' our jobs.
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#206 Sep 02 2014 at 8:57 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Quote:


None of this has anything to do with the police response to the protests and riots though. We can also discuss mistakes made by the police with regards to investigation and whatnot, but I was talking about (and you responded to) whether the physical police actions were causing the violence in the town. I don't believe that they are. I'm quite certain that if the police all stayed in the station and did nothing while the protests were going on, we'd see half the town burn down. And when police didn't respond still, the mob would probably march on the police station and force them to react.
Quote:
Quoted Text


I am not sure you understand how people work. I am not sure you understand how angry people work either ( same way -- there is a shorter fuse though ).

If you do not see very simple cause and effect at work here, I am not sure what can anyone possibly say that would change your world view. You must have lived in some sort of amazing bubble.

____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#207 Sep 03 2014 at 6:38 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I dunno, clearly they weren't that concerned about maintaining the integrity of the crime scene since they didn't file a friggin' incident report for 12 days.

Takes a while to get everyone on board with the same story.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#208 Sep 03 2014 at 7:17 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Elinda wrote:
Too late bucko. Smiley: wink
It's never too late.

Edited, Sep 3rd 2014 9:17am by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#209 Sep 03 2014 at 10:08 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
I dunno, clearly they weren't that concerned about maintaining the integrity of the crime scene since they didn't file a friggin' incident report for 12 days. Seems like they could have covered him up, at least.

Takes a while to get everyone on board with the same story.


Oh, they were gonna cover it up, that's for sure.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#210 Sep 10 2014 at 6:25 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
There is Fergusson 2 going on in luisiana, north iberia or smth. apparently a black kid got himself shot after being frisked and placed in s squad car. details are scarce, but it already sounds like a real better than f1.
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#211 Sep 10 2014 at 6:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I like the phrase "got himself shot". Puts the blame squarely where it belongs. How dare he be in a squad car!
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#212 Sep 10 2014 at 7:06 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Samira wrote:
I like the phrase "got himself shot". Puts the blame squarely where it belongs. How dare he be in a squad car!


Baits'R`us
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#213 Sep 10 2014 at 7:52 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
So 22 years old still qualifies as "kid"?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#214 Sep 10 2014 at 8:20 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
gbaji wrote:
So 22 years old still qualifies as "kid"?


In Obama`s America you are a kid until you are 27. Keep up.
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#215 Sep 10 2014 at 9:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
So 22 years old still qualifies as "kid"?

At my age, it does.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#216 Sep 10 2014 at 9:33 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
So 22 years old still qualifies as "kid"?

At my age, it does.


Someone watched Gran Torino.
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#217 Sep 10 2014 at 9:37 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
So 22 years old still qualifies as "kid"?

Why would that be confusing? Oh right, you listen to GOP talk radio. Let me translate. Ok, here we go...22 year old white male kills a black guy, yup "kid". So we're clear on that one. 22 Year old white male kills 20 in a DUI incident "misguided youth" ok that doesn't apply. Oh, wait , here we go. 22 year old black male killed by police, "thug" For you "kid" translates to "thug" in this context.

I hope that helps.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#218 Sep 10 2014 at 9:38 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
At my age, it does.

Hey if I had a kid at 18, he could call that 22 year old "young man"
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#219 Sep 11 2014 at 7:30 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
angrymnk wrote:
There is Fergusson 2 going on in luisiana,
I like how we skipped one of the cop shoots kid stories.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#220 Sep 11 2014 at 7:45 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Wait, is this like the time some kid(?) got arrested, handcuffed, tossed in the back of a cruiser then managed to pull a gun out of his ass (literally, I believe) and shoot himself in the head?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#221 Sep 12 2014 at 4:03 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Debalic wrote:
Wait, is this like the time some kid(?) got arrested, handcuffed, tossed in the back of a cruiser then managed to pull a gun out of his ass (literally, I believe) and shoot himself in the head?
If that's even remotely true that's bloody impressive.

Edited, Sep 12th 2014 12:35pm by Aethien
#222 Sep 12 2014 at 4:20 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Wait, is this like the time some kid(?) got arrested, handcuffed, tossed in the back of a cruiser then managed to pull a gun out of his ass (literally, I believe) and shoot himself in the head?
If that's even remotely true that's **** impressive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Chavis_Carter

Not sure if that's the one they're talking about.
#223 Sep 12 2014 at 6:16 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Wait, is this like the time some kid(?) got arrested, handcuffed, tossed in the back of a cruiser then managed to pull a gun out of his ass (literally, I believe) and shoot himself in the head?
If that's even remotely true that's **** impressive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Chavis_Carter

Not sure if that's the one they're talking about.


I was thinking about this one.
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#224 Sep 12 2014 at 7:14 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Police Car suicides are a 'thing' now?? Smiley: frown
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#225 Sep 12 2014 at 7:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"Parents Will Be Horrified To Learn This New Teen Trend!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#226 Sep 12 2014 at 10:44 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Elinda wrote:
Police Car suicides are a 'thing' now?? Smiley: frown
Police induced suicides have been a thing for a while. Someone goes out of their way to get chased, and then finally get stopped and either pretend to reach for something or reach for something that looks like a weapon and gets taken out.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 464 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (464)