I bet. However, your sincerity is in doubt and I haven't found discussing theology here to be especially worthwhile. So I'll take a pass. I only responded to Angrymnk on it because his answer wasn't theologically unsound, it was just silly even if you take the gospel in question as a piece of standard literature.
Gotcha, so you're interested if someone claims that Christianity endorses violence because Christ talks about a sword, it's important to make the distinction that it's a metaphorical sword. God murdering children, though, not worth talking about in terms of the immense violence of the Christian tradition.
I guess I'll just wait until the next time someone confuses the virgin birth and the immaculate conception, because those are important things worth posting about.