Elinda wrote:
Huh?
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Je Suis Charlie
Je Suis CharlieFollow
You should know better than that.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Huh?
There's a little teeny troll in all of us waiting for an Alma to call it out.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
I just need your "little teeny" troll to grow up and act more so I can hit 10k before this site is officially dead.
Let's talk about abortion....
Let's talk about abortion....
I guess I'm left wondering how and even why you'd test faith. Faith is not subject to proof; faith is the antithesis of proof. In fact you could argue that proof would destroy faith, as once proof exists faith is no longer required or even possible.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
I guess I'm left wondering how and even why you'd test faith. Faith is not subject to proof; faith is the antithesis of proof. In fact you could argue that proof would destroy faith, as once proof exists faith is no longer required or even possible.
That's because you're solely thinking of "faith" in the sense of "belief in the existence of God : strong religious feelings or beliefs" and not the definition of "strong belief or trust in someone or something". The latter is not in any way obliged to be connected with religion, but is as equally strong (or weak) as the former.
I see, yes. I was thinking of the word as it's actually used.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
I see, yes. I was thinking of the word as it's actually used.
GTFOWTBS!
The word "faith" is commonly used in both ways, you just approached this conversation wrongly.
Edit: Faith is often synonymously used for confidence.
Edited, Jan 23rd 2015 12:25am by Almalieque
Then I'll rephrase: I was using the word as it was first used in this thread.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
Then I'll rephrase: I was using the word as it was first used in this thread.
Edit: Furthermore, I had already previously made the distinction for clarification.
Edited, Jan 23rd 2015 12:44am by Almalieque
I see, yes. I was thinking of the word as it's actually used.
Prove it.
Prove it.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
I have faith in Samira.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I have faith in Samira.
I knew my 'hands off'' style of proselytising would pay off one of these days.
Now, how many extra dicks do you want?
Edited, Jan 22nd 2015 8:01pm by Kavekkk
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
Wait, I should have said 'now, let's cut off your hands'.
That would've been much better, fuck.
That would've been much better, fuck.
Timelordwho wrote:
I'm not quite sure that scheming is an emotion.
Why not both?
![Screenshot]()
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Why not both?
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Smasharoo wrote:
This means that anyone you know is an atheist probably has voiced an opinion that contradicts religion (which to religious people tends to mean "push their beliefs") in your presence.
I'm not sure what 'beliefs' is supposed to mean in this context. Not pretending that it's equally plausible that we lack a complete understanding of the universe or that, alternately, a magic invisible guy who knows everything decided how it works and told a few people a really long time ago isn't really a matter of "belief." Those aren't equally likely positions that both deserve respect. One is comically wrong and should be openly ridiculed and one is the basis for all of human progress since we gained the ability to think.
I'm not sure what 'beliefs' is supposed to mean in this context. Not pretending that it's equally plausible that we lack a complete understanding of the universe or that, alternately, a magic invisible guy who knows everything decided how it works and told a few people a really long time ago isn't really a matter of "belief." Those aren't equally likely positions that both deserve respect. One is comically wrong and should be openly ridiculed and one is the basis for all of human progress since we gained the ability to think.
I'm sure that's what you believe.
See what I did there?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Sir Xsarus wrote:
I have faith in Samira.
You're doing it wrong.
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
Recent Visitors: 374
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (374)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Je Suis Charlie
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC