Weird and ultimately irrelevant place to start considering at no point did anyone say you start threads. Still, which is it? Do you read or watch things and just stay silent about them or do you not read and watch things because you feel they negatively influence your ability to come to your own opinion?
If I don't mention something, it's because I have never made a habit of reading or watching something in the news and then coming here and starting a thread about it
Nice, you actually thought this red herring was your way out. Groovy. Your not creating threads doesn't absolve you of your constant and obvious repetition of talking points and absolutely hilarious transparency in your hypocrisy when it comes to your positions, nor does it somehow magic your flimsy stories trying to rationalize how you come to them.
Again though, that's an interesting bit of projection, given that it's pretty easy to see that I very very very rarely ever start threads on this forum.
An easier pattern is your still trying to distract from your alleged pattern changing from media related to forum related.
It's not a hard pattern to spot.
Pretty easy when there's a decade and a half worth of posts proving the charge. Hell, there's an example of you doing it yesterday.
But yeah, it does make it hard to honestly level the charge you're making at me.
Of course ou don't need to, but you certainly are going out of your way to try. At the same time you really couldn't since the facts simply don't support your assertion that you're not a politically bias parrot with no real opinion of your own that is absolutely horrible at keeping his stories straight.
I don't need to prove anything to you.
You have a problem with people who cling to facts and truth. Not news.
I just find it funny how strongly you seem to need to cling to this belief.
It's a statement of fact, not an argument. Kind of like how "water is wet" isn't an argument. But sure, it's such a "weak argument" that you had to ramble on and on about it. Not a hard pattern to spot.
I just find "you're just repeating what someone else said" to be a pretty weak argument by itself.